Showing posts with label show business. Show all posts
Showing posts with label show business. Show all posts

Saturday, April 25, 2015

99 As I See It (Yeah, it's long)

Some have asked my views on the 99-Seat situation in Los Angeles. Here are some thoughts:

I am an actor first and a trade unionist second. I consider my Equity brothers and sisters in Los Angeles County fellow professionals. I have seen great brilliance in productions in Los Angeles' intimate houses.  I do not sneer that Angeleno actors are "fighting for their right to work for free." I have friends and colleagues who regularly perform as well as produce in small theaters.  I want this art and community to continue.  I also want actors and stage managers there to be under Equity contracts.  I took issue with the original Council proposals which were put to referendum.  My main objection was the rule about membership companies. The final Council-adopted rule is better, but not perfect. Also, Equity's typical ineptitude as regards communication made things much worse than they had to be.

Putting aside the viability of California minimum wage or Hat-to-99, the main reason I want my brethren and sistren to be under contract is for the protections that the institution of a contract would provide.  Remember that the (newly) old 99 Plan was a code and not a contract.  What this means at its base is that it was unenforceable. Equity contracts have the best safe and sanitary protections compared to similar contracts anywhere.  The various clauses in our contracts cover almost any situation that can occur in a theatre. With the old 99, if there were problems, one could call the union, who would in turn have a staffer call in a stern voice and admonish the producing entity to repent and change, but as for muscle - there was none.  The codes assume adherence to industry practice, but the actor or stage manager is essentially on his own.

The other reason that I want to do whatever we can to establish contracts is participation in the health care plan and pension credits. I don't think I have to elaborate on why health care is important. It's harder to qualify under the SAG Producer Pension and Health Plan and the AFTRA Health And Retirement Funds than ever.  (O may they one day merge!) Having access to an alternative health care plan under an Equity contract would be a boon for L.A. area actors.

Many members, especially younger ones, don't give retirement much thought. Under the Equity League (our health and retirement plan) one need only work two weeks of covered employment out of a year to qualify for a pension credit. After ten years (not necessarily consecutive) one is vested and can receive a pension when you reach the right age. And while it's early to even broach this subject, (not to mention beginning a sentence with 'and'), many of our contracts include 401(k) savings plans.

Another element to all Equity contracts is bonding. This is an element of the contract that AEA members rarely have even a passing relationship with. Equity requires each producer to put aside two weeks salary - a bond - so that if something goes wrong; the production runs out of money, the production is prosecuted, etc, the actors are the first to be taken care of.  This is one of the bedrocks of Actors' Equity contracts.

Stage Managers. I'm sure I do not have to inform anyone as to the difference between an Equity Stage Manager and one who is not. A contract would require that the PSM be an Equity member.  'Nuff said.

All the above is what we aspire to in establishing contracts in Los Angeles. This is not immediately the result of Council adoption of the new 99-Seat rules. It is, however, the eventual goal.

Now - Salary.

This is the thing, of course, that has caused the rift between L.A. members and their union. The minimum wage floor has now been set by the union for those that would qualify (see link, above) and this does not even include the above fringe benefits. This is cheap as compared with the national average salary, but still unattainable for some producing entities using their current business models.

And changing the business model is the whole point. There was heretofore no incentive to change the actor and stage manager line items in a show's budget. I am a realist, though. I know that some producing entities will fold. These theaters are not just items on a spread sheet.  They represent actual human beings: colleagues, lovers and friends. These theatre collectives contain memories and some of our collective theatrical experiences, both as creators of art and as a society. They have also provided showcases that have allowed industry folk to consider us for further work.

My feeling is that L.A. intimate theatre will not go away - but it will change. Theatre is created by humans for other humans. The human actors and stage managers are still in Los Angeles. They will adapt, as they do in every other community around the country. Those that produce, be they producer/actors or full time producers will learn how to do so with the new rules. It will be more difficult. It will be different.

Most of my work is not in New York City.  I work quite a bit in theaters around the country with shoe-string budgets. (And some can't even afford shoe strings) Some of these have existed for decades, despite the vagaries of economy, the waning and waxing of charitable giving and other circumstances and situations which seem to conspire against them.  I daresay that what these long-suffering (but thriving) theaters share with some of the venerable smaller theaters in Los Angeles is an individual or very small cadre of committed individuals, without whom the structure would collapse.  The theatre may have dozens of artists and other volunteers who are passionate about their mission and would do anything asked of them to keep their theatre alive, but when push comes to shove, as the old saying goes, it is this tenacious person upon whose shoulders living or dying is decided.

My prediction is that in each extant theatrical organization or collective there will be that one person who seeks to make the organization thrive despite whatever rules or other road blocks are presented before them. Essentially what the new rules are forcing L.A. intimate theatre to do is to learn a new producing model.

Some of these individuals will not wish to produce under a new model or these newly-needed skills may not be in their wheelhouse of talents. If another within the organization does not step-up, that organization may fold.  Or it may morph into a new entity.  The new rules will also see new players create new theatre.  This is what happens to theaters all over the country.

Now, before you say, "Fuck you, Roddy, you don't live here (that is, L.A.) and couldn't care less about us. Go back to living in your own private Idaho where unicorns and rainbows abound," let me tell you that I have seen this scenario repeat itself time and time again. Theatre keeps re-inventing itself.  I see this in communities with nowhere near the funding potential that Los Angeles has.  I have worked in a theatre for the last couple of decades which is the third generation of the original.  Many different buildings, charters, mission statements, boards and donors and different Equity contracts - same artists, though.

Long Beach Playhouse, as you might know, recently posted on its Facebook page that it is "first and foremost, a community theater. We are not, and never will be, a professional theater..." Though I am sure that the Equity members who worked there previously did wonderful work, LBP is now saying that keeping a working relationship with professionals in not a priority.  I'm not disparaging Long Beach Playhouse. They will probably do wonderful work in the future, but they don't seek to be a professional theatre.  One does not need a union card to make art.

There is an implicit compact that one agrees to when one joins a union. It is a political act. For the betterment of my fellows, there is some work that I agree not to take, so as to raise the tide for all boats. I have been offered, dozens of times, plum roles that I was itching to play if would only work off the card, under a different name. Being a union member is a solemn pact to me.  Another actor may not have the union zeal that I have. Lacking passion for, even hating ones union, does not mean that ones actions do not affect others. We are all connected, in a very deep way.

To establish a beachhead in terms of a contract, a group of people (a union, if you will) has to establish a minimum or no progress can be made. I know that we're not dealing with Sam and JJ and this isn't 1919. There are some who should have gone to contract years ago, but the cases of actual wage abuses are rare.  Just as important as stopping unfairness is establishing a mindset within ourselves that will make ameliorating the condition of the actor and stage manager in the upper areas of our psyche.   There is a canard that I have heard for decades now that making a living in L.A. theatre is impossible and never will be possible.  I don't believe it.

Part of changing 99-Seat, be it this change or not this change, was to get rid of the Settlement Agreement so that we may find bargaining partners to negotiate with. This is how contracts are established.

I will leave it those who are actually working under them to tell me how they view the other tines of the new rules, namely the 50-or-Less showcase and the Los Angeles Self-Produced Contract Code. It seems to my eye that these, combined with the contracts above cover most bases.  I know that there are still AEA members in Los Angeles who are unhappy - even lividly angry - over the new rules. It is not an attempt to mollify you to say that I consider this a still evolving situation.  Having served on contract committees and a term on Council (2004-2009), I can tell you that at heart, Equity wants its members to work. When pressure is brought to bear by the members, (as it is now) change happens. Rumors of the Council cynically toasting each other behind closed doors over the adoption of the new rules is false.

To be Pro-99 or not to be?  That is no longer the question. The reality for us all is what Council has voted up. I do think establishing a contract is a high priority.  I also don't pretend as though it is a settled matter.  Even with the new rules, it is still a work in progress.  I am glad that the Los Angeles theatre community (and others around the country) have stepped up and passionately raised their voices. I sincerely hope that we will all continue doing so. Union matters can often be tedious and the minutiae of NLRB rules, state and federal work rules and clause-and-sub-section contract language can make many a crusader lose interest or run screaming into the night. Stay in it.

Anyway, I hope this tells you where I stand on things 99-Seat. Whether this influences your vote or not, please do vote for someone.  It's very important.  I know it is a difficult choice when all you have to go is a 250 word blurb in Equity News, but not voting at all is a huge mistake. I am open to learning and I would love to hear from you.  Please visit my candidate website and you can always email me at buzzforcouncil@gmail.com

Friday, April 25, 2014

AEA Elections - Who gives a crap?

In 2012 there was an important national election for the office of President of the United States.  As it was important to participate, I showed up at my local polling place, pulled back the curtain and started turning levers.  There was more on the ballot than just the office of President.  There were city councilmen.  There were ballot initiatives.  And there were judges up for election.

Judges.

I had done research about all the candidates, except for the judges. I know that who we have on the bench, making decisions in our courts was vital to our democracy but for the most part, I closed my eyes and picked the first lever I touched.

How do you decide who to vote for in Actors' Equity Council elections?  Do you end up just not voting?

Most Equity members know how important it is to have a Council who represents their best interests.  There are those who dig assiduously into the backgrounds of AEA candidates.  They attend membership meetings.  Some contact the candidates directly. When casting ballots, their choices are well-considered.

Most of us, if we do vote at all, use criteria such as the likeability of a candidate. Perhaps we have seen candidate "A" in a play and she was wonderful.  Perhaps Candidate "F" submitted a really good-looking photo to Equity News.  If you use either criterion, you cannot really be blamed.  Our election procedures are not such as encourage much engagement by members.  That said, member apathy is a fact.  Most of us do not even want to think about the union and its dealings in our day-to-day lives.  We just want to work and are happy that our contract provisions are in place.

What type of person runs for a Council seat?

Not anyone who wants a cushy job, that's for sure.  Many do not know that Equity Council members do not receive a salary.  There are over 80 Councillors: 8 officers; 75 Councillors-at-large and 9 Councillors Emereti (retired Councillors who can not vote).  There is a meeting every month, averaging about 4 hours in length.  In addition, every Councillor serves on the board of his or her Region. That's an additional monthly meeting. Special meetings pop up from time to time.  Most Councillors serve on several committees and often chair many of these.  This represents additional hours in a given week. Often, being on Council is a full-time, unpaid job. So I can tell you that any one who chooses to serve doesn't do it just for the nakhes.  I have respect for anyone who does this work, whether I agree with them or not.

I'll tell you what I get out of it. Perhaps you have heard the phrase, "do well by doing good." I am trying to make my life as an actor better by improving the industry as a whole. This is work that I enjoy.  Why?  First, I have known many of the serving Councillors for several years.  We work together well.  They are wicked smart, as Bostonians say.  I have always enjoyed being in a great ensemble in a show. It's about the collaboration. Union service, for me anyway, is a facility which feeds on itself.  What I mean by this is the more I learn about how things work, the more I want to make them work.  I do a lot of research at law libraries, on-line and with labor attorneys and officials. I suppose I might be termed a "labor geek."

I have some pet projects:

  • Public Policy is a large interest of mine.  Lobbying elected leaders for arts funding; tax reform for artists; marriage equality; unemployment reform - these are all things that I have gotten enormous satisfaction out of working on, even though the progress can be glacially slow. I was so glad when AEA got its own AFL-CIO charter. As much as our funds and staff can afford, without displacing our contract negotiation and enforcement capability, we must work with big labor to make things better for everyone. (The better people do, the more they are willing and can afford to see theatre)


  • Election procedures.  This is the genesis of this particular blog post. Our elections do not engage the Membership.  Part of this is Equity's fault.  Some of this is due to the draconian and counter-productive anti-union labor laws. This relates back to public policy, above.  The other side of this equation is member apathy.  One of the benefits of the current touring controversies is that more of us care about who is in the room when we negotiate our contracts.  I hope that this energy increases.  I am positive at the moment that it will.  I hope we all keep the pressure on our fellows to get involved.
  • Membership Education. An educated and informed membership is our most valuable tool in maintaining a strong union and achieving our goals.  If you are an AEA member and are reading this, count yourself as part of the solution.  Thank you. I would love to have a permanent institution in our union.  Similar to the AFTRA-SAG Conservatory.  Call it Equity University.  In addition to free workshops and classes to improve our performing skills, many of us need business training and need to learn about how the union works.  This will take some major money.  We have an under-used and under-funded Actors' Equity Foundation. This is an organization separate from the union and not in any way funded by union dues that could be used to bring this about.  Right now, we have periodic seminars and workshops that spring up when we can cobble them together.  I have taught a few. We could use more.
  • Access to work. Equity Principal Audition and Equity Chorus Calls (EPA/ECCs) Agent Access Auditions (AAAs) are all programs that people are getting real work from. The former has grown in value due to vigorous contract enforcement. The latter is a result of our quite good relations with talent agents that we have nurtured over many years.  Organizing new work is vital.  There are two methods: top down and bottom up. Our preferred method is top down - we bargain with an employer who agrees to engage in collective bargaining with Equity.  Bottom up - organizing stage managers and actors to unionize is often not practical. By the time a vote to unionize is taken the show either closes or is abandoned by the producer.  But one form of bottom up organizing we can do is to go to areas where there is a non-union acting community and teach the value of Equity work and offer support. We will never be rid of non-union theatre, and indeed there is a place for it, but we can make Equity work the thing to aspire to.

It is vital to make ourselves available to the Membership.  This is why I have this blog.  This is why I make my email address available to any AEA member who wants it.  Questions? Comments?  Hit me back.

Friday, April 18, 2014

AEA Council Man On The Street Video

The ACTogether people who sponsored the Meet The Candidates event at the Players Club in NYC last week, made this man-on-the-street video, which is quite fun and in which you can see some of the candidates (including me) in action, rather than just our black and white still photos in Equity News. (NB: To the Snark Factory - no bad hair day jokes, OK?)

Tuesday, April 15, 2014

I Saw Your Brassiere on Facebook


Jimmy Ludwig and I and an occasional column in Equity News called Ask The Geeks. 
Here's one from April of 2009.  We are all wending our way through the morass that is or digital world.  Theatre people have special considerations not only due to the public nature of our work, but our untraditional work places.

Equity’s Committee on New Media and New Technology (lovingly named The Geek Committee) cares about issues concerning our Members and New Media.  (And there are tons of issues) So to help clear up some confusion, welcome to another edition of: Ask The Geeks
 
Ask The Geeks
Q.   Last week, on my birthday, a bunch of people burst in to the dressing room and videoed me in my bra.  I posted it on my Facebook page.  I think it’s hysterical, but my dressing roommate went postal because part of her arm and the back of her head are in it.  You can’t even tell it’s her but now she’s really cold toward me.  Am I right or is she having a cow for no good reason?
A.    No, the cow is well deserved.  If this were at your house, your only crime would be insensitivity.  The problem here is that you were at work.  Delete the video.

Q.   I’m building a website.  I found a pirated clip from my show on YouTube.  I want to lift a clip (just me singing and nobody else in frame) and put it up on my site.  Problem?  After all – it’s my image and I didn’t pirate it.
A.    But you don’t own the show in which your image appears – the producer does.  If you use ANY of that footage, you are as legally vulnerable as whoever pirated it in the first place.

Q.   I’m really pissed-off!  One night we had to stop the show and improv some dialogue until our set started working again.  Somebody in the audience recorded the whole thing and now it’s all over the internet!  A friend told me there was nothing I could do because it was news and therefore “fair use.”  (The incident made all the newspapers the next day) Is that right?
A.    The Doctrine of Fair Use is an exception to copyright laws.  This is major lawyer territory but basically, the copyright law says that fair use of a copyrighted work without permission can occur if it is used as (1) criticism and comment, (2) parody and satire, (3) scholarship and research, (4) news reporting and (5) teaching.
That said, what the audience member did was to steal your image.  Period.  If it was during a performance, he not only stole your image, but the property of your show’s producer too.  Catching the thief is the hard part, but if you can, you may be due damages.  Equity has been successful at having such footage removed.

Q.   In trying to promote myself, some friends and me have made an online webisode.  We’ve had a lot of hits.  We’re not making any money and I’m giving every cast member a copy.  No harm – right?
A.    Depends.  Do you or any of the other cast members belong to either AFTRA or SAG [SAG-AFTRA]?  If you are, did you get the proper paper work?  You could be in violation if you didn’t.  So much trouble can often be avoided with a single phone call.

That’s all for this month’s edition of ASK THE GEEKS!
 
Remember: Your image has value.
 
Your image (this includes your voice, photo and any other reproducible part of you) is yours to sell or give away as you please.  But it gets complicated anytime other people are involved.
 
The media landscape changes literally every day.  Wrapping ones mind around the concepts of New Media can cause crossed eyes.  Equity is there to help.  That’s one of the things you pay dues for.  Producers have deeper pockets and better access to lawyers than most actors do.  If you’re not sure about an issues dealing with New Media, call Equity or email taping@actorsequity.org.*  Your union wants to protect you – not punish you.
 
Under Equity’s collective bargaining agreements, the ways in which a producer may exploit your image are laid out very clearly. † There are penalties for the use of your image outside of the parameters of your contract.
 
Under federal law 18 U.S.C. 2319A, it’s a felony to “transmit, distribute or offer to distribute” sound or video to anybody anywhere (including posting them on social networking sites) without the consent of the performer(s) involved.
 
Here are some rules of thumb:
·      Yours is the only image you have the right to promote, but…
·      Just because it’s your image doesn’t guarantee that you have that right.
·      If you tape (film/photograph) it – make sure you have the right to do so.
·      If you don’t have the right to film it – don’t.
·      If you didn’t film it yourself – you probably don’t own it.
 
Tune in down the road for more pertinent info.  Until then, stay in touch at taping@actorsequity.com.*

* updated email: capture@actorsequity.org
† this was written before many of the Media packages which are now standards in many of our contracts.

Sunday, March 30, 2014

Buzz Roddy's 2014 Candidate Statement




If you have the time, and you will be in New York, I would love to meet you.  Please come to The Players Club on Monday, April 14th 4:00 pm - 7:00 pm EDT to meet me and many other candidates in all categories (Principal, Stage Manager and Chorus)

and of course, the National AEA Membership meeting on Friday, April 11, (2PM EDT, 1PM CDT, 10A PDT) all over the country.  I will be at the New York Hilton, but there is a telephonic hook-up with the rest of the office cities.

*reprinted from Equity News April 2014

Wednesday, March 12, 2014

Brave New World - On-Line EPA Sign-ups

Another no-brainer.

Actors waiting at an extremely early hour in an office building lobby for said building to open up, so that they might sign-up for Equity Principal Auditions (EPAs) are mystified as to why Equity seems to be dragging its blue and white derriere when it comes to providing on-line sign ups.

 If ever there were an obvious need which could be easily met, it would seem, this is it.  Please pardon the New York City-centeredness of this post, but this is where the big problem is. EPAs generally last 7 ½ hours and have audition slots for 6 actors every twenty minutes, or 18 per hour to fill the contract requirement of 115-135 actors in a day.  

All things being equal, this provides each actor with 3.33 minutes to show him or herself in a good light.  In addition, if there is time and monitors are pro-active, they will fit alternates in when enough people have not used all of their 3.33 minutes.  With a typical monologue or 32-bar cut song taking between 1-2 minutes this usually happens.

During high season - i.e. summer stock season from late January to early April - the competition is heavy and to have ones choice of the day's appointment slots requires a pre-dawn get-up.  The timing is more critical if there are multiple calls and at different locations about the city.  On top of this comes scheduling the rest of ones life.  Some of us have full-time jobs. Some of us have to take the kids to and from school.

The benefits of signing up in your bathrobe at home and having your day planned before you walk out the door are patently clear.  Here is the down side:

Before I continue, I want you to know that I am in favor of going on-line (the internet on-line, that is).  But before we throw all to technology, we should be aware what we're trying to put in place.  With every technological advance comes new problems.  Here are some which will surface right away:
  • Some members do not have access to the technology.  
For many calls, being logged on at exactly the right time will be imperative to guaranteeing a preferred audition spot. As opposed to a physical line, where members sign up in the order that they arrive, in the digital world, hundreds will "arrive" at exactly the same time and will have to vie for their spot in the virtual line. There is a large number of people who do not have smart phones (or data plans) and so cannot be on-line at will. Some do not have home computers or have spotty or no internet.  There are those, especially older members, who rely only on the public library for any internet access. One argument says that this being the modern world, one must have these tools to compete.  My mother was in the business back in the early 1950s and did not have a telephone.  This was not uncommon then. Certainly, making accommodations today for those with no telephone would seem ludicrous.  Some day everyone will have access to the web everywhere, whenever they desire, but we are not there yet.  Until the day when having personal, mobile high speed internet is commonplace, the playing field will not be a level one for actors when it comes to EPA sign-ups.
  • Your competition just increased ten-fold.
With the analog version of EPAs one has to physically show up.  Inherent in this circumstance is a geographic limitation.  If one lives in Boston, a four-hour drive from New York, one would have to leave in the wee hours to sign up for an EPA in NYC.  There is a risk, that one could drive all that way, buy gas and parking and still not get an appointment.  Obviously if you have a guaranteed appointment, you might be more likely to come a greater distance, and help swell the ranks of those vying for an appointment slot.  Right now there are close to 30,000 AEA members in the Eastern region.  More than half of that number live in New York City.  A couple thousand more live within commutable distance to the city. Let's say one-fifth of this number attend EPAs.  I know NYC-based actor who will not go to an audition below 14th Street.  But, I also know actors who will fly across the country for an EPA.  If actors in Sacramento, California can obtain audition appointments in New York City, we will start seeing Golden Staters in the NYC Audition Center.  Not that Californians or Montanans or Mississippians are not welcome to NYC auditions.  This scenario will not be a daily event, given the expense of time and money, but multiply this times a couple hundred additional people vying for one of those 115-135 slots and the arithmetic is clear.

  • Frivolous sign-ups and no-shows
Getting up at sunrise to audition is a serious commitment.  Obviously, those who wish to be seen for a given show or season of plays have read the breakdown and have in mind roles for which they might be a good fit. One of the reasons that EPAs have become more effective hiring tools over the past couple of decades is that actors are focusing in on giving casting directors viable choices instead of just showing up to be seen, as used to be the case when EPAs started.  For this reason, CDs are taking EPAs more seriously than ever and using the EPA system as a real tool in casting a project. Casting is entirely subjective, of course, and there are roles for which one could possibly be right, but the role may not be an exact fit.  The only way to know is to show up and audition.  Appointments on the internet increase the likelihood that an actor might not be as assiduous in his or her assessment of the role's appropriateness.  And in the virtual world of obtaining appointments, it is more likely that an actor might sign up "just in case" he or she feels like showing up.  Virtual sign ups will increase the number of actors who show up for a role that is all wrong for them, or who will sign up and not show up at all.  In either case, if one of these gets an appointment which could have gone to you - you're still out in the cold. (Maybe literally)

  • Tech glitches

I am sure you do not have to be told that networks go down all the time.  If the system crashes during sign-up due to an over-loaded server which would come from too many people logged-on, there would be nothing that could be done in real time.  The sign up would have to start from scratch when the problem gets fixed.  If some how there were  glitch where the completed sign-up list goes away into the ether - nothing could be done.  We all know this situation will happen a few times, no matter how many safeguards there are in Equity's IT Department.

  • Sh*t happens
We're all busy. The best laid plans get way-laid.  Auditions run long, making our appointments later in the day stack up.  Trains stop dead in tunnels.  Traffic is insane.  Assuming that on-line sign ups were in place, what procedures would there be for missed appointments?  There do come times when one misses an assigned appointment and desires to obtain a later one the same day.  With virtual sign-up it would almost be assured that all appointments would be gone before the actual call even begins.  Would there be a virtual alternate list, too?  It is possible that leaving the system to a computer could prevent human remedies to human problems that arise in a given day?  Perhaps if the alternate list were not virtual - that one must physically show up to be on it - this could be one remedy.  Signing-up virtually would make ones schedule more rigid in this case, and not less.

  • Solutions

"Alright already, enough!" I hear you say, "I want on-line sign ups NOW!" One of the most important elements in getting on-line sign ups to be a reality is member involvement.  Too many policies and systems for those who attend EPAs have been imposed by those who have no experience with same.  This is where we come in.  We have to be a part of this march into new technology.  Get involved.  Join the EPA Committee, write Council, go to membership meetings.  Tell the powers that be that we want to be involved in crafting this new system.  Here are some suggestions that I would offer:

  • Partial On-line slots

Until we live in a world where on-line access and speed are more equal and ubiquitous, perhaps in every block of 6 audition slots, we start out with 2 out of the 4 being on-line accessible, with the remaining 4 of the traditional variety. This might be a good get-your-feet-wet test toward the move into on-line sign-ups.  Let's start with a call that usually would not have a high turn out. As Equity gets the hang of administering the system, it could expand to more calls and maybe eventually more slots being virtual and fewer early get ups.

  • Geographic Limitations

Based upon member numbers (on our Equity cards) on-line sign-ups could be limited to - say people within a 100-mile radius of New York City.  Similar limitations could be applied to the L.A. or Chicago memberships.  Outside of these groups members would be required to physically show-up.  Actors who move around could petition to be included in any of these geographical groups.

  • No-show policy
Let's establish a policy aimed at those who abuse the system, where those who blow-off three or more auditions are prohibited from signing up online for 6 months.  We all have times when time and circumstance collude to make us miss appointments. There are those, though, who selfishly game the system and this policy is aimed at them.

  • Bar-coded or magnetized stripe membership cards

If everyones union card could be scanned at the audition, many benefits could be in place.  If every audition monitor had a digital reader, check-in for virtual appointments would be fool-proof and instantaneous; getting bumped for late-check in would save vitriol being hurled at the monitor; all demographic information would be updated instantaneously (no more white cards!); work search records for unemployment purposes could be printed out from ones account through the Member Portal.

  • Texts/Twitter/Email notifications

Many AEA members use the excellent service, Audition Update, to keep abreast of how crowded calls are, who is in the room and other info helpful to actors.  Through the above-mentioned Member Portal, ones account could be set to be notified, in real time, on ones smartphone as to the progress of alternate lists, availability of appointments, last minute changes in audition preparation, cancellations, et al.

  • Archiving
It's a small business and people move around a lot.  If there were a searchable archive of EPA/ECCs, one could see who they met and on what date, thus allowing them to better keep records and be on top of their careers.

  • Do ECCs NOW
All the caveats above about EPAs are, for the most part not germane to Equity Chorus Calls (ECCs) Right now, an open list is posted on the board at Equity and members sign up first-come, first-served. On the day of the call, the list is read and members receive appointments as soon as their names are called.  We could have on-line sign up for these calls today with very little effort or cost to the Association.  Just like now, the list would open at 9:30am, a week before the call. A computer terminal would be made available and members could sign up just as they always have.  (And illegible handwriting would no longer be an issue, nor would scratch-outs, repeat names or fake names like "Seymour Butts")  At the close of business, the virtual line would open and anyone could sign up from anywhere in the world.  On the day of the call the list would be read just as always.  If my dream of bar-coded cards were in place, members could swipe to check-in at a half-hour before the call just like now. Those who were not previously signed-up on line would be given appointments in the order that they checked in.  ECC virtual sign-up is something that is actually doable right now.

  • ECC cards
While we're on ECCs, another element that could be streamlined is the Chorus Call Card. Right now every auditioning actor at an ECC is given a card to fill out - a mini resume, if you will - to be filled out by hand.  This is sometimes given to the auditor(s) in addition or in lieu of of a traditional photo/resume.  If there were chorus cards available in ones Member Portal account page that could be printed out, this would make every actor's presentation that much more professional and slick.  Few of us got into show business because we had good penmanship.

You probably have ideas and solutions that I didn't mention here.  What do you think?

Sunday, February 23, 2014

EPAs

1560 Broadway, New York City
February 20, 2014, 7:30 am
NYC temp 18˚ F,  -7˚ C

There are approximately 80 people, mostly Equity members, some EMC, some non-union, all lined up and waiting for AEA's Audition Center to open.  At least it's warm in here.  Two years previously, before the current construction of the Equity building, we would all have been lined up along West 46th street, smelling the sickly sweet aroma of bags of restaurant garbage.  Some have coffee and bagels; some newspapers, headphones attached to iPods.  It is stock season, and we are participating in a daily ritual.  I have already figured the optimal time to schedule the auditions upstairs because in addition to these two, there are two more shows that many of us are interested in being seen for at different venues in the city.

The various types and experience levels vary like the EKG of an A-Fib patient.  There are newbies - one who literally disembarked at Port Authority Bus Terminal this morning.  One guy, a nodding acquaintance of mine for years now, has done at least four Broadway shows that I know of. There are a few former leading ladies who are in process of morphing into a new type - what ever that is.  "Type" of course, being a marketing word that agents use which does not serve the scope or depth of what we do.  Reading a paper up the line from me is a rather unremarkable looking woman who I recognize from a call yesterday.  She has a rolling drag-bag, the kind that adds to the precariousness of walking in this city.  Inside this pink coffer printed with purple flowers she has all the wherewithal to perform wonders.  Once she plies her necromancy she will morph, larva-like, into a magnificent butterfly.

The energy vampire is here.  He talks endlessly and seems to suck all the life and concentration out of the room.  He knows everything and wants to tell you about it.  There are at least a dozen that I have worked with personally.  To see a cross section of the acting community in New York, come have coffee with us here one early morning.

I have been going to EPAs literally for decades.  Like many here, I have my arsenal at the ready.  I have around 30 speeches of varying lengths from 20 seconds to two minutes that I keep well-oiled.  I have as many 16-32 bar cuts in my book of songs that I stay up on.  I can pretty well jump into any EPA, tailor my material toward the role that might be right for me, and present myself well.  This is a skill set that I have honed over many years.

EPAs scare some of us.  And not everyone has or wants to develop this type of EPA skill set.  There is nothing lacking in them.  We simply approach EPAs differently.  I am not necessarily a better actor just in this case, more adaptable vis-a-vis these types of auditions.  Some feel uncomfortable about "not being invited to the party" as one is in an agent appointment audition.  The feeling there is that at an agent audition, someone in a position of hiring has picked you.  EPAs smack of ones being pushy and insinuating oneself upon the casting director.

That's right - decades of EPAs.  

Equity Principal Auditions (EPAs) were started to provide access for the many actors who do not have agent representation, though there are many represented actors here.  All Equity agreements have mandated EPAs.  Being required, people ask, are they not taken seriously by the auditors?  Do they not resent being here - a resentment which sets them immediately at an adversarial relationship with whomever comes before them? Not according to Tara Rubin, Bernie Telsey and James Calleri in a recent edition of Theatre Talk where they discuss how much they rely on EPAs.

It's not necessarily a one-for-one proposition. Getting the job for which you audition is not the only possible outcome of an EPA.   Some CDs do all their casting from these calls.  Some less.  Very often, EPAs are but one arrow in the casting director's quiver.  Very often they are used as screening auditions.  Think on it:  A casting director, who is doing what we're doing, (i.e. going from job to job) is paid to bring to his or her bosses some possible candidates for a role.  These actors must be right for the role and pleasant to work with.  (The latter often being more important than the former.)  Bringing someone in who is neither will make this the last job this CD does for this producer.  So if a casting director does not know you, an EPA can serve as a first date, so to speak, and if it goes well - perhaps a second.  The casting director puts trust in the actor that that actor will make the CD look good.

Most casting directors have hundreds of actors rolling around in their brains.  Getting to the top of his or her mind is the trick.  So, your agent did not get you an audition for this play.  Your attendance at the EPA might jog the CD's memory enough to get you called in to a subsequent audition. Very often I have been called in for an unrelated project because I had met or re-met a CD at an EPA for something else. Every theatre CD in New York at least knows my name, and many because I had initial contact at an EPA.

I find this preferable to paying for a "class," which puts the casting director in the position of teaching me as a "student."  With an EPA, we are on an even plane.  There are many casting directors who teach great classes and are both knowledgeable as well as excellent teachers.  There are informative and valuable seminars, classes and one-on-ones.  But if you are trying just to get access, go to an EPA.

Two sugars

"Who's in there?" is a frequent question among actors at EPAs. Many are angry that after waking up early, waiting in line, warming up and preparing for an audition they enter the room and only to find the coffee boy sitting behind the table.  Most of our contracts say that EPAs...


"...shall be conducted by the director and/or Producer (or designated representative); any such representative shall have the authority to set up a subsequent audition and to share in casting recommendations..." 
     --- AEA Off-Broadway Contract, Rule 4 (D) (12)

There's the rub - casting authority.  We all know that sometimes we do, in fact, get the coffee girl or boy to audition for.  But I can enumerate any number of big time CDs who were, once upon a time, assistants to the assistant. Though I may be thrust into a state of high dudgeon at such an occurrence, it's a small business and casting personnel migrate from job to job and though my audition may be between coffee runs today, I am making an impression that might pay off down the line.

EPAs are not for everyone.  For some, these calls are too frenetic; too crowded. There are also those who have never been to an EPA due to some perceived idea that those who attend these calls are inexperienced, boorish, low-class or other epithets.  Not all who go to EPAs are unrepresented, either.  Some signed clients of agencies use EPAs, too.  Agents don't always submit us for things that we are perfect for, or do not realize that something in our experience and talent could give us an upper hand in a given role.  Some agents don't have clout with certain casting directors.

EPAs have improved over the years.  There are two main reasons for this: Equity has been enforcing the EPA clauses in the contracts and AEA members have been upping their game and showing up prepared, professional and for the appropriate roles.

If you have not been taking advantage of this marvelous opportunity - I urge you to.  People are getting work.

Saturday, February 8, 2014

Can You Build Your Own Website? (Yes, You Can)

CAN YOU BUILD YOUR OWN WEBSITE? - YES YOU CAN!
By Buzz Roddy, Eastern Region Principal Councillor.
December 8th NYC Council Room of AEA - In an effort to help members more elegantly sail into the computer age, the Eastern Region Membership Education Committee sponsored a seminar entitled "CAN YOU BUILD YOUR OWN WEBSITE? - YES YOU CAN!"
"I'm a MAC…" declared the chiseled-jawed Jimmy Ludwig
"and I'm a PC," I countered (with a jaw not so chiseled.)

Buzz Roddy - PC user
Jimmy Ludwig and myself, fellow self-taught web site builders, hosted a seminar aimed at Members & Equity Membership Candidates (EMC's) who have thought a website might be a good idea, but had no idea where to start. Attendees were anxious about sticking their toes in the waters of the information super highway (pardon the mixed-metaphor) and were about 50-50 in their respective PC/Mac usage. Jimmy handled things from the MAC perspective and I, the PC. We fielded questions and tried to quash the fears of the web-phobic. In a lively 90 minutes, we went over how a website can burnish ones professional image and even directly lead to jobs. "Your website is a show," I said, "and you are not only the star, but the director and producer, as well."

Jimmy Ludwig - Mac user
"Why have a website at all?" asked one member. With the ubiquity of the internet in all areas of our business and much casting being done on-line, those who dismiss the web as a peripheral option will soon find themselves out of the loop and in the unemployment line. "We as performers have to keep in step with this technology," declared Jimmy, then holding aloft his iPhone, "in four years, even this will be out-of-date!"
Though not a technical tutorial, we went through the steps involved in getting ones website from being just an idea into a fleshed-out presence on the World Wide Web.
We cuddled up to dreaded terms like 'Domain Name,' 'Webhost' and 'HTML,' (Upon closer examination, they showed themselves to be not so threatening.) We discussed how building a website is a process and that it can cost very little money if you only do some homework. I saw not only the veil of trepidation lift from many faces, but the dawning of comprehension, and in some cases - even zeal.
Emphasizing the importance of keeping ones website current, Jimmy said "Having a website is like having a pet, you have to feed and walk it." Rather than an archival repository, it is better to think of a website as a living, growing document. And I always stress the importance of interactivity. It is good to have something for people to do on every page of a site. That said, just because one has a lot of mind-blowing technology at ones fingertips doesn't mean that one has to use it all. If your website is about you, the performer, don't overwhelm the reader's eye with too many animations; a list of your favorite movies or photos from your last trip to Mardi Gras. Both Jimmy and I are proponents of simplicity. My main rule of thumb - Make it fun, but always be professional.
Should I hire a professional web designer? Some came to the seminar pondering whether or not to hire a pro. Just as when interviewing a headshot photographer, asking to see past work is important, as well as making sure that you and your web designer are in accord about presenting your image. Cost, naturally, is an important consideration.
The questions from the floor came, at first with trepidation, much like the first day of Sex Education class. Web-wise, many felt embarrassed that they didn't know certain terms. Luckily, Jimmy Ludwig is the Dr. Ruth Westheimer of the web world and allayed any abashedness. As the room warmed up, questions came more rapidly as well as answers - not just from me and Jimmy, but from all over the room so that the seminar was more a dialogue than a class. As I said before, Jimmy and I are both autodidacts - everything we learned about web design was by trial and error. What we have learned is what works and what does not. For both of us our knowledge (and our websites) continue to evolve.
To paraphrase a common pop-psychology phrase, "Website design is a journey - not a destination." We gave a cursory page-by-page tour of our own websites and talked about desirable features: photos and resumes, of course, but we also touched on online video and audio demos and security. Many musical performers have need of web marketing for CDs (especially if they are not signed to a label). Some have club acts and want to keep fans updated. The web is an easy and low-cost way to accomplish all these. And in these days of blogs and instant disinformation, ones website can serve as a central source for press and official biographical info.
Jimmy, the MAC user, wanted to have apples available for snacks but thinking it would be partisan, we served oranges.
Buzz Roddy and Jimmy Ludwig are currently serving on Equity's National Council, (the governing body of the Association). Additionally, Buzz is a Vice Chair of the Eastern Region Membership Education Committee and Jimmy is Chair of the New Technology Committee. The Membership Education Committee presents seminars and workshops as a free benefit of Equity Membership. More seminars are planned - so check out the Equity website for specific dates and times.
from the Actors' Equity website December 17, 2008

Friday, February 7, 2014

Unemployment Insurance Is A Right, Not Charity!

Unemployment Insurance – Get Your Money
By Buzz Roddy
Membership Education Committee
“Unemployment insurance is not charity – it is a right,” I hectored Members who attended AEA’s New York City seminar, “Unemployment Insurance – Get Your Money.” 
Many of us do not realize that while we are employed and drawing a paycheck, the employer is obliged to make contributions based on those earnings to the state Unemployment Insurance Fund from which U/I benefits are paid. To get it, all we have to do is put in a claim.
We are indeed entitled to this money, but how to navigate the byzantine protocols of the various states’ departments of labor?  What to do when Department of Labor claims specialists, unfamiliar with our category of employment, miscalculate or even deny our claims?
The October 7, 2013 seminar was hosted by the Membership Education committee. On hand was Unemployment Insurance (UI) expert Brian Curtis, Supervisor of Labor Disputes for the NY State Department of Labor.  Mr. Curtis walked us through eligibility, filing a claim, and getting ones benefit rate correct.  Possessing 36 years of experience and a gift of clarity, Curtis succeeded in delivering information in bite-sized chunks and answered members’ questions.  (In other hands, these two hours might have been a snore-fest, but the discussion was lively and enlightening.)  The seminar left Members empowered and even smiling with the knowledge that opening and managing an Unemployment Insurance claim is fully within their capabilities.
Some insights and advice:
•  UI is not charity.  It is a right.
•  UI applies to W-2 wages, not 1099 jobs
•  Your UI benefit rate is based on your past earnings
•  You can apply for UI benefits in the state that you live or in the states where you have worked
•  Keep good records (paystubs, W-2s, etc)
•  Can I work while collecting UI? (Answer: Yes—in certain circumstances)
•  Never send original documents to prove a claim
•  Learn the time constraints in opening or appealing a claim
•  Know your benefit rate to the penny before you file
•  If your benefits are denied – appeal. Never give up
So many actors who ask me about UI are either intimidated or ashamed about collecting.  There is no reason to be either.  Learning your states’ UI system and eligibility criteria, though daunting is not impossible.  And you, as a dues-paying member have help—and she has a name: Valerie LaVarco, Equity Business Representative for Unemployment/Worker's Compensation. She is your go-to unemployment insurance specialist. If you have a problem or question, contact her atvlavarco@actorsequity.org or at 212-869-8530.
Unemployment Insurance is for most of us a necessary bridge between jobs which allows us to keep up that dance class; pay the rent; eat.  And this money has been set aside for your use.
Now - get your money!

Reprinted from the Actors' Equity Website, October 2013

Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Freelance

I have worked quite extensively in Europe and just returned from a tour in Germany.  We did 23 different cities in 6 weeks and put in over 4000  miles (6400 km). We had one stretch where we played a matinee in one town, did an evening performance in another, then back the following day to the first city and then the evening in the second city.  Only those who negotiated for it got any extra money, and no one got enough sleep.

One does not have to work long in another country before realizing that American actors have the best working standards in the world.  A few years ago, in partnership with Fédération Internationale des Acteurs or FIA, Equity hosted Sankwe Michael Nkambole, who was then the president of the National Arts Association of Zambia (NATAAZ).  We showed Michael around New York, took him to see a few shows and had him as a guest at one of our monthly Council meetings.  He let us in on the state of the theatre in his country. Many of our actors snicker at seemingly frivolous requirements like the "Equity cot," while in Michael's country, when a production there got a bit controversial, and angered faction burned the theatre down.

In Germany, the arts are state-supported.  Most medium to large city have a Stadtheater or city theatre, and each of Germany's 16 states or Länder have their own Staatsheater.  These facilities are as good or better than anything we have on Broadway.  Most have full staffs of stagehands, stage management, front of house personnel, actors, dancers, orchestra, ballet corps, etc.  Actors get a 2-year contract and are therefore civil servants.  The idea of a freelance actor for the most part, does not exist in the consciousness of those in the lively arts.  Though the romance of words like "Broadway," and "Hollywood" resonate with German actors, when I explain the day-to-day life of auditions, meetings, agents, staged readings and the realities of the 90/10 ratio of unemployed/working, they are horrified and grateful that they are where they are.

They still long for America, though.

Though my tour did not involve anyone blowing up the theatre, I was still wanting many of the standards and protections afforded me as an Equity member in the States.  Though the GDBA Genossenschaft Deutsche Bühnen-Angehöriger (the German theatrical union) certainly has its standards and practices, it is nowhere near ours.

American actors have the idea that they are out battling the elements all alone.  So many long for a greater feeling of community.  Do you remember before you had your Equity card?  Having the card seemed like an unattainable goal; one that was prized and coveted.  How long did it take for some of us to lose that sense of accomplishment and fall into the jaded, been-there-done-that feeling that being an Equity member is now but a veritable tax which one is subjected to.

I got involved in things Equity like many, in that I was angry and "wanted to tell those clowns down there" a thing or two.  Very quickly did I find that I could not only affect change for the greater good, (as well as my own) but that I was part of a very vital community of artists and business people.  Yes, I am a free lance - roaming the countryside plying my trade - but I am also surrounded by a collective populace heading in the same direction.  It's a voluble, passionate, gregarious and talented group.  And I am one of them.

You can be, too.  Go to a quarterly membership meeting; join a committee (there is a committee for just about any facet of life in the theatre; attend a Council or regional board meeting as an observer (any member in good standing has this right) or run for Council.  You will get back much more than you give.